One comprehensive repository is required
Reponse on behalf of UKMi Executive:
A comprehensive collection of all SPCs and PILs is needed. In the modern culture of "openness", it is a curious anomaly that this doesn’t already exist, and we would encourage and support the MHRA to address the issue. Lack of information is a key factor inherent in medication errors, and a key tenet of the NPSA’s safety alert about injections was that there is no single place where professionals can go to get administration information about all UK licensed injections.
NHS pharmacists, especially those working for UKMi, spend a lot of time chasing companies for such info - it is needed for patient safety, therapeutic decision-making, and formulary work. Online access would save considerable time and enable patient-centred problems to be resolved more quickly. Some generic companies are loathe or very slow to provide copies of SPCs.
The eMC is an extremely valuable and reliable resource, and we would like to see any development building on their success, rather than have an additional place to look for SPCs and PILs. The eMC is easy to use, well-presented, has been responsive to the needs of users, and offers a rigorous audit process. The new search facilities are especially commendable.
There is also perhaps the opportunity to present further new information, such as pictures of each product. This would allow pharmacists to see how products are presented and labelled, which often has important risk implications. It would be particularly welcome if the package inserts for injectable medicines were made available at the same time because these often include information not contained in the SPC which health professionals rely upon for administering injections safely.
We would welcome an opportunity to work with the MHRA and eMC, if our input could help to make this comprehensive database possible.
Why the contribution is important
Current tags










MHRA site still needs a little work in places before increasing the complexity of the site….e.g. Serious adverse report analysis is not available unless you type it into the search field.







If this central database was created, it would be a good opportunity to standardise SPCs to ensure consistency, and to ensure terminology between SPCs is similar. For example, the terms 'intravenous bolus' and 'intravenous infusion' are not used consistently between SPCs.

If this central database was created, it would be a good opportunity to standardise SPCs to ensure consistency, and to ensure terminology between SPCs is similar. For example, the terms 'intravenous bolus' and 'intravenous infusion' are not used consistently between SPCs.
Posted by Lawrence Berry (lberry@medicines.org.uk), Datapharm CEO